|
Post by chamoniards on Mar 28, 2009 15:14:52 GMT
I know this post will have limited appeal but there may be few interested in this. Stop reading now if you find power meters boring. I recently did an FTP test at home on my turbo which consisted of a 20 minutes session riding as hard as I could for that period. By subtracting 5% from the average power you can deduce your FTP (1 hour maximum mean power). It resulted in an estimated FTP of 346 watts. This is the basic FTP test that is in Allen and Coggan's book 'Training and Racing with a Power Meter'. The weekend after I raced and recorded a 1 hour mean maximum power of 340 watts which goes to show how good a testing method this is as it was only 6 watts below my tested FTP. Knowing where my FTP is allows me to accurately calculate my training zones on cycling peaks. Here's the test graph: And here's a selection from the race graph:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2009 22:58:30 GMT
Would be more appealing if you posted your weight. Cycling Sport posted Hammond's graph's, over 5hrs at 300+ watts!
¬¬¬
|
|
|
Post by chamoniards on Mar 29, 2009 8:52:24 GMT
The point was merely to illustrate how good this method is for calculating FTP and training zones. There are several riders in Dulwich training and racing with power meters now, it's very important to do this test on a regular basis to keep your training zones accurate. Weight isn't an issue when calculating training zones.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2009 14:14:27 GMT
Using my own line-of-sight method, I have calculated that Kevin weighs about 85kg. R.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2009 14:34:39 GMT
BTW: if you have a power meter, you might enjoy this article. It decribes how to average out your normalised power data to highlight where in your session (or race) you really put some effort in. Neat. link: alex-cycle.blogspot.com/2009/03/matchfinder.html
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2009 14:35:20 GMT
If we guess the weight correctly do we get to keep him?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2009 15:14:06 GMT
Weight is useful for comparison. Your graphs are a useful hint. Certainly Hammond's graphs made interesting/different reading. 85Kg?
¬¬¬
|
|
|
Post by chamoniards on Mar 29, 2009 21:14:52 GMT
Not far off, I'm 81Kg.
|
|
|
Post by chamoniards on Mar 29, 2009 21:18:45 GMT
BTW: if you have a power meter, you might enjoy this article. It decribes how to average out your normalised power data to highlight where in your session (or race) you really put some effort in. Neat. link: alex-cycle.blogspot.com/2009/03/matchfinder.htmlthe SRM software does that for you...
|
|